Ammiano condemns SCOTUS’ upholding Arizona’s “show me your papers” provision, urges Gov. Brown, AG. Harris to ensure California becomes antidote to Arizona with TRUST Act

June 25, 2012

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASEJune 25, 2012

Sacramento - In response to the US Supreme Court ruling in the case of Arizona v. United States, Assemblymember Tom Ammiano, (D-SF) and author of California’s TRUST Act (AB 1081), issued the following statement:

While I am relieved the Supreme Court struck down portions of Arizona’s discriminatory law, it is heartbreaking that the most odious provision, the “show me your papers” section (2B), still stands. This should be called the “racial profiling” provision given the painful impact it will have.

With today’s ruling, the court has further legitimized the destructive practice of local police serving as an extension of our broken immigration system. This plunges millions of our friends, neighbors, and family members across the country into greater risk of separation from their loved ones.

But ironically, the damage was in many ways already done – by the federal “Secure” Communities or S-comm deportation program.

S-Comm has burdened our local governments and put even victims and witnesses of crime at risk of deportation, making us all less safe. It has even mistakenly trapped US citizens in our local jails for immigration purposes.

California’s TRUST Act would limit the unjust and onerous detentions for deportation in our local jails of community members who pose no threat to public safety. To ensure that our state does not become another Arizona, I respectfully urge Governor Jerry Brown and Attorney General Kamala Harris to support the bill.

Statements from the sponsors of the TRUST Act follow. The bill is supported by a broad coalition of organizations and elected officials from across the state.

Pablo Alvarado, Executive Director, National Day Laborer Organizing Network: “The fact that the court could not tell whether on its face section 2(b) conflicts with federal policy means federal policy (i.e. S-Comm) is far too similar to Arizona policy. But it doesn’t have to be that way in California.”

Reshma Shamasunder, Executive Director, California Immigrant Policy Center: “With its decision on the provision that encourages racial profiling, the Supreme Court has effectively turned back the clock on our hard-won civil rights protections. In the wake of this bad ruling, California lawmakers must lead the nation in moving forward once again, by passing the TRUST Act as soon as possible.”

Angela Chan, senior staff attorney, Asian Law Caucus: ”The Trust Act will assist local police in rebuilding trust with Asian, Latino, and many other immigrant communities who are fearful of reporting crime because of S-Comm’s broad deportation dragnet.”

Background: The Arizona law, passed in April 2010, drew widespread condemnation because it would have forced local police to act as immigration agents and unleashed a wave of profiling based on appearance and accent. Immigrant advocates said the program would entangle police in what is an essentially broken immigration system.

At the heart of the similarity between S-Comm and SB 1070 is the fact that under S-Comm, the fingerprints of everyone arrested – even survivors of domestic violence arrested with their abusers – are automatically sent to ICE. Immigration officials then pressure local governments to hold immigrant community members in jail for extra time, at local expense, so that ICE can pick up the individuals for deportation. However, these “hold” requests are voluntary and a number of jurisdictions have already chosen to limit how they respond.

Nearly 7 in 10 of the 72,000 Californians deported either had no convictions or were brought in for minor offenses.

The TRUST Act passed the state Senate Public Safety committee 5-2 on June 12, 2012, and now heads to the Senate floor. The bill sets a minimum standard for local governments not to submit to ICE’s requests to detain people for deportation unless the individual has a serious or violent felony conviction and guards against profiling and wrongful detention of citizens and crime victims.

In an editorial published June 22, the New York Times endorsed the TRUST Act, stating: “The bill would enhance the ability of local departments to fight crime by restoring community trust and saving jail space for serious offenders. It deserves to become law.”


State Senate Committee approves bill to counteract disgraced “S-Comm’ deportation program

June 14, 2012

TRUST Act would ease burden on local governments of controversial program which has deported 72,694 Californians

SACRAMENTO – On June 12th, 2012, by a vote of 5 to 2, the California State Senate’s Public Safety Committee approved the new version of the TRUST Act (AB 1081 – Ammiano). The bill would reform California’s participation in the discredited “Secure” Communities deportation program – which has faced severe criticism for undermining public safety and burdening local governments – by limiting the unfair, extended detention of immigrants in local jails for deportation. Details are available below. The bill now heads to the Senate Appropriations Committee for consideration.

The committee heard powerful testimony from Blanca Perez, a Los Angeles mother facing deportation due to an arrest last year for selling ice cream on the street who urged the state to set an example for the rest of the country with the passage of the bill. “Immigrants in Alabama and Arizona are afraid today, but as my experience tells us, immigrants in Los Angeles, here in Sacramento and even in San Francisco, have reason to be afraid as well,” Ms. Perez told the committee.

“Blanca’s story confirms that ICE’s priorities are stunningly out-of-whack,” said Assemblymember Tom Ammiano. “This is something I’d expect in Arizona, not in Los Angeles. Persecuting this courageous, hard-working mom for selling ice cream on the street is a ridiculous waste of resources. Today’s vote recognizes that S-Comm is sabotaging our public safety. The TRUST Act is the solution we need to begin rebuilding the confidence that our local law enforcement worked so hard to build, but that ICE has shattered.”

Tuesday’s decision comes as the Supreme Court continues to mull Arizona’s anti-immigrant SB 1070, which like the controversial S-Comm program entangles local police in federal immigration enforcement. To create a “bright line” between local police and ICE, the TRUST Act would:

  • Set a minimum standard for local governments not to submit to ICE’s requests to detain people for deportation unless the individual has a serious or violent felony conviction.
  • Guard against profiling and wrongful detention of citizens and crime victims and witnesses. Localities that detain individuals with serious convictions for deportation would develop common-sense plans to prevent profiling and wrongful detentions.

Last year, a report by UC Berkeley’s Warren Institute estimated that nationwide, some 3,600 US Citizens were apprehended by ICE due to S-Comm since the program’s start and also found S-Comm was disproportionately targeting Latinos.

Under the program, the fingerprints of everyone arrested – even survivors of domestic violence arrested with their abusers – are automatically sent to ICE. Immigration officials then pressure local governments to hold immigrant community members in jail for extra time, at local expense, so that ICE can pick up the individuals for deportation. However, these “hold” requests are clearly voluntary under federal law.

The vote falls one week after Washington, DC became the latest in a string of local governments across the country to adopt policies similar to the TRUST Act and also comes days after the California Catholic Conference – which consists of all ten of the state’s Catholic Bishops – publicly announced its strong support for the bill.

Over one hundred community members from around the state attended today’s hearing in support of the bill.

About the TRUST Act: In 2011, the first version of the bill passed both the California Assembly (47-26) and the Senate Public Safety Committee (5-2). The bill originally sought to modify California’s agreement with the federal government over S-Comm to curb the program’s well-documented abuses. However, in a stunning display of bad faith, ICE shredded all state agreements last year, but claimed states still needed to send fingerprints. ICE’s surprise maneuver spurred a months-long process of consultation with groups across the state, resulting in the focus on ICE’s burdensome “hold” requests.


Redistricting: What It Is and Why You Should Care

June 21, 2011

By Carlo De La Cruz & Ana Duong

San FranciscoQuiz of the day: In 2001 California had one Asian American elected official representing our communities on the State wide or Federal level—Mike Honda.  How many API elected officials did we have in 2010? Answer: Ten!  In 2010, ten API elected officials were representing our communities across the state in the State Assembly, Senate, and US Congress. 

In less than ten years the API community has grown from having one elected official on the state wide or federal level to having ten, this growth is due in part to the growing numbers of Asian Americans as well as increased civic engagement from the Asian American community.  But the political representation for our community is by no means guaranteed for the next decade; in fact, our community’s ability to have a meaningful voice and vote in the political process all depends on a few lines and maps being drawn right now by the California’s Citizens Redistricting Commission (CRC).  After each Census, redistricting takes place to redraw districting plans to reflect the demographic changes and equalize district populations.

The Commission is required by law to hold two sets of public hearings, the first one before maps are drawn and second one to receive feedback on the first draft maps. For a schedule of the public hearings, please visit http://wedrawthelines.ca.gov/hearings.html. The implementation of this new commission gives other California voters the opportunity to get involved in the redistricting process.

On June 10, 2011, the Commission released its first round of draft maps for Congressional, State Assembly, State Senate and Board of Equalization districts.  The maps can be viewed online on the CRC’s website at www.wedrawthelines.ca.gov.   The Commission is currently in the process of holding public hearings throughout the state to collect public input on the maps and will do so until July 12th.  That leaves less than one month for community members, leaders, and advocates to testify before the commission to ensure that the AAPI community is not divided by the redistricting process. Therefore, this time period is crucial for community testimony and public input to ensure the final maps reflect the needs of the community.

District boundaries drawn in the past have resulted in fragmented communities, including AAPI communities. Without public input, the commission will most likely remain unaware of the existing communities of interest and their respective geographic parameters.  The final lines and maps that the CRC adopts will affect elections for the next decade, determining if communities have the ability to vote as one bloc and have a meaningful role in the political process.  In order for our community to protect and extend the gains we’ve made in political representation we must engage in the redistricting process.

The redistricting process is particularly important for the AAPI community in the Bay Area as it means either representation or a silenced voice in the political process.  For example, in the 2001 redistricting, the San Jose neighborhood of Berryessa was split among four State Assembly districts, even though over half of Berryessa’s population is AAPI. District boundaries that split AAPI communities weaken the political voice of AAPI communities. When AAPI communities are fragmented, they do not make up a significant portion of any one district, diminishing their ability to get their elected representatives to address their needs.

In another more recent example, Indian Americans in southern Alameda County said “an early version of the map split Fremont’s fast-growing South Asian community into two congressional districts, diluting its political power” (sfgate.com).  Thanks to community testimony and a large showing of community support, the lines were modified to protect the growing South Asian community in southern Alameda County.   The commission has demonstrated they are committed to hearing and considering public testimony, but that can only happen when the community is present and engaged.  Learn how to testify to the commission at http://www.redistrictingca.org/more-info/.

The Commission will be holding a public hearing on June 25 in San Jose and June 27 in San Francisco to receive more public input before the release of the second draft maps. If you are interested in testifying before the Commission or learning more about the Asian Law Caucus’s Redistricting effort, please contact Carlo De La Cruz at CAPAFR2011@gmail.com.

Want to learn more? Watch the following video brought to you by the Greenlining Institute: http://youtu.be/eqBRz7yu4vs.


The Impact of the Gulf Oil Spill on AAPI Communities

July 1, 2010

NOTE: Originally published in White House Office of Public Engagement Blog on June 17, 2010

This article has been re-posted with permission of the author

By Miya Saika Chen and Audrey Buehring

In the last month, we were deployed by the White House Initiative on Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders to join the Unified Area Command in the Gulf Coast and assess the immediate needs of the Southeast Asian American community, who make up one-third of the seafood industry workforce in the region.

We visited community centers, churches and temples in Alabama, Mississippi and Louisiana.  We met with seafood processors, fishers, crabbers, shrimpers, oysterfolk and boat welders, many who have been working in these specialized trades for generations.  Over meals, roundtable discussions and town hall meetings, we listened to people talk about their livelihoods, their deep connection to the sea, and the challenges they face as a result of the devastating oil spill.

In Irvington, Alabama, we spoke to a Thai American crabber who owns two boats and has lived in the United States for over 40 years.  She and her workers set traps and catch crabs during the day, then make deliveries to restaurants and seafood processing plants in the evenings.  She had invested in $17,000 worth of new traps in anticipation of the coming crab season.  All of this has been lost since the oil spill began over seven weeks ago, and she’s been unable to provide for her workers, nor for herself.  During a town hall meeting with Vietnamese, Laotian, Thai and Cambodian Americans, she kindly smiled and said, “Just please put us to work.  We are a proud people.  We don’t want to beg.  We want to work.”

In Biloxi, Mississippi, we heard from the daughter of a Vietnamese American fisherman, who, along with many of her peers, have galvanized a coalition of community groups in the area to organize bilingual community forums for Vietnamese American fishers.  She told us, “Our families are falling apart.  Our lives as we know it are gone.  We will no longer get to eat the seafood our father and brother catch.  We won’t have the opportunity to come help with unloading the shrimp when their boats come in after two weeks out at sea.  We won’t have financial support from them because they can’t do the work they have done for the past 20-30 years – catching shrimp, fish, crab, oysters.  It is very sad to see our family members’ careers as fishermen ending because of this BP oil spill disaster.”

Many Southeast Asian Americans in the Gulf Coast region remain linguistically isolated and unaware of the available disaster recovery resources.  The lack of information is compounded by the loss of income and livelihoods, resulting in increased hardship and confusion.

The same challenges are faced by the broader community.  In Dulac, Louisiana we spoke with a Native American, French-speaking shrimper who left school after the fifth grade to start shrimping with his father.  Now he waits each day for news of the waterways opening so that he can go out and practice his trade, which he describes as being in his blood.  “It’s frustrating, I just want to work.”

In an effort to address the community needs, we visited government service providers offering individuals assistance with disaster relief loans, employment preparation and training, and food assistance throughout the three states.   We found that Federal agencies wanted to be responsive to all affected communities in the Gulf Coast region but were unclear of the extent of the community needs, and required additional support to get information to limited English speaking communities.

The Administration has taken important steps to providing this support to get information out to these vulnerable communities.  The Deepwater Integrated Services Team and the National Incident Command deployed Community Relations Outreach Teams along the Gulf Coast, with a team specifically focused on addressing language needs and low literacy levels.  We conducted trainings for these highly qualified teams on the importance of outreach, translation, cultural competence and trust when working with Limited English Proficient communities affected by the oil spill.

While we were deployed, Secretary of Labor Hilda Solis, who has made it a priority for oil spill clean-up training materials to be in multiple languages, convened a series of roundtable discussions, including one focused on Vietnamese American workers and community leaders from in Louisiana and Mississippi, to ensure that their health and safety are protected in the clean-up activities.

We know the people are struggling and dealing with serious challenges, and we will continue to reach out to the impacted communities and work hand in hand with the Federal agencies to ensure that the needs are met.   Please find the White House Initiative on Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders at www.aapi.gov to get updates and learn about ways to get involved.

Miya Saika Chen is the Advisor on Community Engagement and Audrey Buehring is the Advisor on Intergovernmental Affairs in the White House Initiative on Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders.


Liberty and Justice for All, Except for Immigrants

March 8, 2010

By: Christopher Punongbayan

In the last week, the cases of two immigrant families surfaced in the mainstream media and highlighted the ways our federal immigration system is failing our country.  In New York City, the New York Times covered the story of Qing Wu, a young Chinese American man who committed an offense from which he has completely turned his life around.  His reward? Deportation. Read the rest of this entry »


Immigrant Youth Due Process Policy Passes, Implementation Stalled

February 19, 2010

By Angela Chan, Staff Attorney, Juvenile Justice and Education Project, Asian Law Caucus

In July 2008, San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom implemented a draconian policy requiring probation officers to report all suspected undocumented youth to Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) for deportation right after they are arrested.  This means that youth are being reported to ICE even before they are appointed a public defender attorney or receive a hearing on the alleged juvenile charges. 

The Mayor’s overly broad policy has torn many innocent families apart.  Since 2008, over 160 children have been reported to ICE without regard to their innocence or whether they committed a minor first-time offense. In June 2009, The New York Times featured the story of 14-year old Roberto who was reported by San Francisco to ICE for bringing a bb gun (a gift for good grades) to school.  He had no prior record and hurt no one. For Roberto, a teachable moment became a nightmare as he is facing separation from his entire family. Read the rest of this entry »


A Decade of New Youth Activism, a Generation of Protectors

December 29, 2009

By Raj Jayadev

This piece appeared in New America Media.  It is re-printed here with the author’s permission.

Around this time last decade, I was wading through clouds of tear gas and dodging rubber bullets from the Seattle Police Department. I was 24, it was the World Trade Organization (WTO) protests and a moment that I thought signaled the inauguration of a new youth activism that would hit the ground running with the new millennium.

I was right about the arrival of a new political engagement of young people for the decade, but wrong in my presumption that it would look and feel like the activist movements in America’s past that I had read about. I thought young people, 16 to 24-year-olds, were going to continue what my generation did — fight for inclusion, to be part of the ongoing struggles over civil rights, immigration and the environment. Instead, they decided to lead them. They did so by redefining what it means to be an ‘activist,’ who could be one, and new ways to get the job done. They made history in the process, and did so on their own terms.

In Seattle, I was part of a “youth of color contingent.” In a mainly older, white anti-globalization movement in the United States, to define and pronounce ourselves was important. Our fight was just to be part of the fight, and that’s exactly what we did. Never before had we known what it felt like to completely take over city blocks, to make global financial powers nervous, or to freeze a major international convening. Read the rest of this entry »


AAPIs Needed for California’s New Redistricting Commission

December 21, 2009

Originally posted on APAs for Progress.

Every ten years, we draw new district maps for Congress, the California legislature, county boards of supervisors, and city councils.  These maps show the boundaries of each district.  When we redraw the maps every ten years, we change the boundaries so that each district contains the same number of people.  This process is called redistricting. Read the rest of this entry »


One Year After Prop 8

November 4, 2009

photo_feature_prop8_impact2_jpg1_kjarticlemainBy Karin Wang

Originally posted on APAs for Progress. Photo courtesy of New America Media.

On November 4th, 2008, Proposition 8 passed in California, eliminating the right to marry for same-sex couples. One year later, the rights of the LGBT community are again up for a popular vote, in Maine, Washington and Michigan.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

As a straight ally in the fight for marriage equality, I am often asked why I work on the issue of marriage equality.

It was not something that I planned Read the rest of this entry »


San Jose Police Beating Stirs Distrust and Resentment

November 3, 2009

reposted from here with permission from the author
Police Brutality San JoseBy Raj Jayadev

 

On Oct. 24, the San Jose Mercury News released the video of a San Jose State math major getting beaten and tased by the San Jose Police Department in his home on Sept. 3, 2009. Police were called to the scene after 20-year-old Phuong Ho allegedly wielded a knife during an altercation with his roommate. All the viewer can hear, in between groaning cries of pain and calls for mercy, are the cracking sounds of the batons as they meet 20-year-old Phuong Ho’s head and body, and the torturous zapping of a Taser gun. It is, in a word, disturbing. Read the rest of this entry »


Thai American Organizing and the Berkeley Thai Temple

October 8, 2009

By Dionne Jirachaikitti

STTTblogpicOn September 22, 2009, the Berkeley City Council voted 9 to 0 in support of the Berkeley Thai Temple.  The vote came as a relief to the Thai community in the Bay Area who had been waiting for over a year to know whether they would be able to continue their tradition of merit-making in Berkeley.

Read the rest of this entry »


Smoke and Mirrors

September 3, 2009

This blog post is re-posted from here with permission from the author.

statue_of_liberty-749682

By  Shahid Buttar

Department of Homeland Security Secretary Napolitano recently highlighted her department’s efforts to reach out to build “stronger relationships with Arab and Muslim Americans, as well as South Asian communities across the country,” seemingly reflecting an awareness of how the war on terror has stigmatized and cast irrational suspicion on these groups. Despite the best of intentions, however, Napolitano’s self-assurance is premature. DHS’s engagement of vulnerable communities emphasizes form over substance and, historically, has amounted to mere public relations.

Outreach efforts conducted by the Office of Civil Rights and Civil Liberties (CRCL), for instance, have long fallen short of repeated requests from vulnerable communities. Just last month, a coalition of over a dozen civil rights organizations issued a letter (PDF) to Secretary Napolitano reiterating a series of substantive and structural concerns, while proposing concrete solutions to fulfill the new administration’s promise to pay greater respect Read the rest of this entry »


Aspiring for fairness and opportunity

August 21, 2009

buttons Posted by: Christopher Punongbayan

Below is the story of 21-year old, Stephanie, who is an advocate for the federal and California DREAM Act.   She is a member of the immigrant youth group, ASPIRE – Asian Students Promoting Immigrant Rights Through Education.

My name is Stephanie and I am 21 years old. I was born in Guan Dong, China. Once people get to know me more and know about my personal history, they reply; “Oh! Stephanie, you are so mature!” Every time I hear that, it reminds me of what I have gone through independently for six years. The things I have gone through were full of tears, sadness, loneliness, happiness, obstacles, homesickness, hopes, and dreams. Read the rest of this entry »


API youth fight for legalization

August 20, 2009

timthumb

Posted by: Christopher Punongbayan

Below is testimony given by Ju Hong, a 19 year old student at Laney College in Oakland, in a recent legislative visit to the office of the Speaker of the House of Representatives, Nancy Pelosi.  Ju is the school’s first Asian American student body president.  His activism is part of a national Asian American and Pacific Islander Week of Action urging Congress and the President to pass a fair and humane immigration reform bill that upholds the rights of all Americans. Read the rest of this entry »


What if Henry Louis Gates Were Not an Acclaimed Professor?

July 29, 2009

This article was originally posted on New America Media and is being reposted here with the author’s permission.

By Raj Jayadev

Professor Henry Louis Gates, recently arrested, gets to share a beer with the man who arrested him, Sgt. James Crowley, at the White House with the President of the United States. It is a highly uncommon ending to an unfortunately very common occurrence – a man of color citing racial profiling after an arrest.

If this incident is really to be the “teachable moment” President Obama hopes for, the real question to explore is this: What would have happened to Dr. Gates if he were not an acclaimed scholar and author, friend to the President, and someone whose stardom could greatly embarrass a city and county justice system? Read the rest of this entry »


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.