Why Jeremy Lin’s race matters

February 15, 2012

Note: Originally published on http://edition.cnn.com/ under “Opinion.” This article has been re-posted with the permission of the author.

Editor’s note: Ling Woo Liu is the director of the Fred T. Korematsu Institute for Civil Rights and Education, which helped pass California’s Fred Korematsu Day, the first day in U.S. history named after an Asian American. She is a former reporter and video producer for TIME, CNN’s sister publication, in Hong Kong.

Ling Woo Liu

Ling Woo Liu

(CNN) — A week ago, on feel-good Super Bowl Sunday, TV viewers in the U.S. state of Michigan were subjected to a racist campaign ad sponsored by former Representative and now-Senatorial candidate Pete Hoekstra. The ad, which suggests that his opponent, U.S. Senator Debbie Stabenow, spends too much government money, shows an Asian woman riding a bicycle in a landscape of rice paddies. “Your economy get very weak. Ours get very good. We take your jobs,” says the native Californian actress in a mock Chinese accent while addressing “Debbie Spend-It-Now.” Hoekstra also appears, saying at the end, “I approve this message.”

Public condemnation ensued, with demands for an apology and the ad’s removal.

It’s not the first time that China, or any connections to China, have been used to stoke fear this U.S. election season. In early January, a group in support of Republican presidential hopeful Ron Paul released a campaign ad slamming then-candidate Jon Huntsman, the former ambassador to China. The “China Jon” ad showed Huntsman speaking Chinese and wearing a red tikka on his forehead (a sacred mark associated with Hinduism) and questioned his adoption of girls from China and India. “Jon Huntsman: American Values?” the ad asks, calling him “The Manchurian candidate,” “Weak on China?” with ostensibly Chinese music in the background.

Paul denounced the ad, telling CNN he had no control over his supporters’ actions.

Then on Thursday, a U.S. Marine sergeant was found not guilty of hazing Lance Cpl. Harry Lew, who committed suicide last April in Afghanistan. A Marine Corps report revealed that Lew had been beaten by his superiors with sand poured in his mouth for falling asleep while on duty. Another Marine was sentenced to 30 days in jail and demoted; a third faces court-martial over the death. Lew’s case along with that of Pvt. Danny Chen, who was found dead in October from an apparent suicide, have spurred Asian American members of Congress to demand hearings on hazing in the military.

Chen, the only Chinese American soldier in his unit in Afghanistan, was called “gook,” “chink” and “dragon lady,” forced to crawl on gravel while fellow troops threw rocks at him, and made to shout instructions in Chinese to fellow troops (no one else in his unit spoke Chinese). The Asian American civil rights group OCA has met with Pentagon officials to demand better treatment of Asians in the military.

Against all of this, Jeremy Lin, a Harvard grad and the NBA’s first U.S.-born player of Chinese or Taiwanese descent, has vaulted himself to stardom. On Saturday, Lin led the Knicks to their fifth straight victory. His 109 points in his first four starts this past week have surpassed Allen Iverson’s to become the most by any player since the NBA-ABA merger in 1976.

Lin’s popularity skyrockets

Jeremy Lin setting the NBA abuzz

Turning it around in China

Read about Linsanity vs. Tebowmania

For those who’ve been following the campaign ad controversies as well as the Lew and Chen cases, Lin’s meteoric rise has been a much-needed sign of hope. But the conversations on Facebook, in bars and living rooms are as diverse as the Asian American community itself. Some are pumped up about seeing an Asian face next to Kobe Bryant’s or moved by Lin’s public devotion to Christianity. Others are analyzing Lin’s academic and athletic prowess and thinking about the role model he’ll be for their children.

Jeremy Lin: The NBA’s breath of fresh air

Lin himself has been candid about the racism he’s encountered along the way. “It’s a sport for white and black people,” he told the San Francisco Chronicle in 2008. “You don’t get respect for being an Asian-American basketball player in the U.S. … I hear everything. ‘Go back to China. Orchestra is on the other side of campus. Open up your eyes.’”

Read how Lin has a shot at basketball immortality

Unfortunately, success doesn’t stamp out racism. Minutes after Lin’s breathtaking career-high 38-point performance against the LA Lakers Friday night, FoxSports.com national columnist Jason Whitlock tweeted “Some lucky lady in NYC is gonna feel a couple inches of pain tonight.” After condemnation by the Asian American Journalists Association, he tweeted an apology, acknowledging that he had “debased a feel-good sports moment. For that, I’m truly sorry.”

Almost exactly a decade ago, some of us remember similar knocks against a certain 7’6″ new kid on the block. USA Today ran a column by Jon Saraceno in 2002 saying, “the [Rockets] franchise could wind up with egg foo yong all over its face” and “What happens the first time a bona fide NBA strongman, say Shaquille O’Neal, whacks [Yao Ming] in the chopsticks?”

Just this past week, a Manchester United fan, Howard Hobson, was banned from matches for three years and fined 200 pounds (US $315) for cursing and making monkey sounds at Stoke City’s Kenwyne Jones, who is from Trinidad.

To be fair, Lin and other minority athletes today have not been subjected to the level of racism that African American sports pioneers faced before them. Jesse Owens was a great American athlete who prevailed despite being born into an officially and unofficially racist society. The African American track star, who had to live in off-campus segregated housing at Ohio State University, went on to win four gold medals at the 1936 Summer Olympics in Germany, much to the dismay of Adolf Hitler.

Three-quarters of a century later, there are those who want to leave race out of the equation altogether and embrace minority athletes, actors and other pioneers for their skills alone rather than their skin color. “Many people want the debate to end,” says Laurens Grant, the director and producer of “Jesse Owens,” a forthcoming PBS documentary. “But the debate isn’t settled. It won’t end until there’s more opportunity.”

Many of us have been lucky enough to escape the burn of bullying and racism. We might have walked through our schoolyards without hearing taunts from fellow students. We might have gotten the promotions we deserved at work. Our perfect American English may have averted giggles and impatience. We may have served in the armed forces without being treated any differently from fellow troops. And we might have been lucky enough to escape the perpetrators of hate crimes, like the laid-off Detroit autoworkers who in 1982 beat Vincent Chin, a Chinese American, to death with a baseball bat after his bachelor party because they were bitter about competition from Japanese carmakers.

Such xenophobic sentiment gets eerily stirred up by ads like the ones attacking Sen. Stabenow and Jon Huntsman.

Hopefully one day, Americans of Asian descent will no longer be seen as foreigners, economic competition or anything less than equal Americans. Until then, race matters, whether we like it or not.


Trashing Transparency

December 19, 2011

NOTE: Originally published on the ACLU’s  Blog of Rights on December 19, 2011. This article has been re-posted with the permission of the author.

By Nasrina Bargzie, Staff Attorney at the Asian Law Caucus

In November 2005, U.S. marines in Iraq were involved in the killing of 24 civilians—including women and children. Shortly after the story became public, the ACLU filed a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request for all documents related to the incident and other civilian casualties of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. Although we received thousands of documents in response, the government did not give us a single document relating specifically to the killings at Haditha.

Apparently, it threw them away instead.

Last week, The New York Times reported that it had found hundreds of pages of records relating to the horrific incident in Haditha . . . in a junkyard, being burned as kindling to cook a dinner.

The U.S. government could have turned these documents over and, in the process, helped Americans obtain the information they need in order to critically reflect on our conduct in Iraq and other theaters of war. Instead it chose to trash transparency, and as a result, strangle any chance of proper accountability.

The documents discovered by The New York Times reflect a disillusioned and tragically misdirected mission that resulted in death and suffering in Iraq and among the Marines themselves. Ironically, the military’s attempt to fog the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan has worked doubly against the interests of the American people. First, the American public was denied access to records reflecting its government’s conduct for years. Second, its servicepersons were forced to operate in an environment where the death of innocent civilians was considered a “cost of doing business,” resulting in severe damage to the servicepersons themselves.

These documents should have been made public. Throwing away documents relating to atrocities in Iraq will not make those atrocities go away. Instead, it only breeds distrust in our government and deprives us of the information we need as citizens to hold our leaders accountable and to make informed choices about our policies.


Violence Against Asian Americans in SF and Oakland Highlight Need for Safer Neighborhoods for All

May 5, 2010

By Titi Liu, Executive Director

Over the past several weeks, hundreds of Asian American residents in San Francisco and Oakland have testified at city hall meetings and participated in community rallies against violence and demanded action be taken to improve safety.  Founded in 1972, the Asian Law Caucus has a long history of speaking out against violence and harassment against Asian Americans, including addressing crimes against Vietnamese residents in San Francisco housing projects in the 1990’s and the targeting of South Asians, Arabs, and Muslims before and after 9/11.  The ALC also has provided know your rights and anti-violence trainings to thousands of youth, parents, and educators.

The ALC applauds the efforts of community members who have worked to draw attention to this important issue.  The ALC also calls for a thorough investigation of each of the incidents against Asian victims that have occurred in the Bayview and in Oakland.  Effective solutions to prevent these incidents from reoccurring can only be developed if the individual causes are investigated and addressed.

In addition, while these cases are being investigated, proactive steps, both short-term and long-term, need to be taken to improve public safety for all residents as acts of violence create fear in the hearts of all community members, African American and Asian American alike.  The San Francisco and Oakland police departments need to strengthen relationships with community members to ensure victims of crime feel safe coming forward and reporting incidents.  This includes, but is not limited to, improving language access services and cultural competency of officers, which is a project the ALC has been working on in San Francisco for the past several years.  The police also need to be clear about what they can do if incidents are reported.  Violence prevention and intervention programs that have been shown to have positive results in both cities need to be fully funded and supported rather than being the first to be targeted for cuts each year.  Structural changes also are needed to preserve and expand safe and affordable housing in these communities for all residents.

We also must be vigilant as communities move forward in working together to create safer neighborhoods to not reinforce stereotypes about one another, but to instead enter this difficult yet important dialogue with an open mind and an open heart.


Fallen Americans, Fallen America: the Response to the Violence at Fort Hood

November 7, 2009

togetherBy Veena Dubal, Staff Attorney, National Security and Civil Rights Program

Yesterday, was a difficult day for me.

I spent the morning “dialoguing” with a former Republican Senator, a conservative law professor, and the director of a non-profit that works against “big government” (among others) on issues of race in America.  We debated everything for an educational television program:  from the use of race in law enforcement to affirmative action.

During the course of this two hour program, I tried to maintain a countenance of civility while listening to a white man deploy narratives of “personal responsibility” while talking about black men and violence.  After abstractly opining on “racism in America” for the taping, I walked back to our offices in Chinatown in the drizzly San Francisco rain and thought about my clients whose lives were plagued by the complexities and intersections of racism and imperialism. Read the rest of this entry »


Ten Years is Enough: Remembering the Victims of Hate Crime Violence

August 10, 2009

jiletoWritten by: Stewart Kwoh, President and Executive Director, Asian Pacific American Legal Center; Titi Liu, Executive Director, Asian Law Caucus; and Ben de Guzman, Kaya: Filipino Americans for Progress and the National Federation of Filipino American Associations

August 10th marks one decade since the brutal and senseless hate crime spree of an avowed white supremacist in Southern California. That rampage in 1999 left five people wounded (including four children) at the North Valley Jewish Community Center and ended the life of Filipino American letter carrier Joseph Ileto. This tragedy shocked Californians, Read the rest of this entry »


CA Issues Apology or CA Apology Issues?

August 1, 2009

scan0001

By: Tiffany Fong
ALC Law Clerk

While browsing Yahoo News in the morning, I came across a TIME article called “California Apologizes to Chinese Americans.”  Intrigued, I opened the link, hurriedly skimmed the prose, and sighed, “Finally!”  Immediately, I forwarded the news to my family, friends, and the Asian Law Caucus. Read the rest of this entry »


Should the SF Chronicle Be Proud of its Award?

June 25, 2009

immigrantrightsBy Angela Chan and Martha Bridegam

Note: Originally Posted on Beyond Chron, June 19, 2009

On Sunday, the San Francisco Chronicle reported its crime writer, Jaxon Van Derbeken, had received a journalism award for “Excellence in the Coverage of Immigration.” The presenting organization was the innocuously titled Center for Immigration Studies (CIS). From the blandly favorable news story, you wouldn’t have known CIS is strongly anti-immigrant. Read the rest of this entry »


Virtually Interned – Racialized National Belonging from World War II to the War on Terror

June 19, 2009

fredkorematsu

By Veena Dubal, Staff Attorney 

“To cast this case into outlines of racial prejudice, without reference to the real military dangers which were presented, merely confuses the issue.  Korematsu was not excluded from the Military Area because of hostility to him or his race.  He was excluded because we are at war with the Japanese Empire, because the properly constituted military authorities feared an invasion of our West Coast and felt constrained to take proper security measures, because they decided that the military urgency of the situation demanded that all citizens of Japanese ancestry be segregated from the West Coast temporarily . . .” –Korematsu v. United States (1944)

JavedIqbal“The September 11 attacks were perpetrated by 19 Arab Muslim hijackers who counted themselves members in good standing of al Qaeda, an Islamic fundamentalist group.  Al Qaeda was headed by another Arab Muslim – Osama bin Laden – and composed in large part of his Arab Muslim disciples.  I should come as no surprise that a legitimate policy directing law enforcement to arrest and detain individuals because of their suspected link to the attacks would produce a disparate, incidental impact on Arab Muslims, even though the policy’s purpose was to target neither Arabs nor Muslims.” –Ashcroft v. Iqbal, (2009)

 In 1942, in the midst of World War, 120,000 Japanese Americans were sent by federal order to internment camps.  Fred Korematsu resisted and was soon arrested and sent to Topaz, a camp in the Utah desert that was surrounded by barbed-wire fences and watchtowers armed with machine guns.  Read the rest of this entry »


It’s Not Just a Name

April 28, 2009

eva-a

By: Kwanyee Eva Auyeung

During a Texas State House Elections Committee hearing on voter identification held on April 7, 2009, Betty Brown, a Republican, said: “Rather than everyone here having to learn Chinese … Do you think that it would behoove … you and your citizens to adopt a name that we could deal with more readily here.” Such statement is shockingly offensive, Read the rest of this entry »


Rights not Wrongs at the Border

April 23, 2009

US-Mexico Border (photo courtesy LA Times)

By Christopher Punongbayan

The Asian Law Caucus recently released a report on civil liberties and profiling at the U.S. Border with a particular focus on the stories of Muslim, Arab, and Middle Eastern travelers. We promote reforms that safeguard First Amendment rights, eliminate racial, religious, and national origin profiling, and promote stricter standards in the use of the terrorist watchlist.

Equally as notable – though rarely put into conversation with these border concerns – are the problems related to regulation of the US-Mexico Border. Read the rest of this entry »


Inspired or Frustrated? Bearing the Korematsu Legacy

April 23, 2009

fred-with-medal-of-freedom

By Titi Liu

This week, we issued a landmark report that documents intrusive profiling practices by the Department of Homeland Security at the US border and details legislative and administrative changes that must be made. These profiling practices by the US government have undermined the civil liberties of countless Arabs, Muslims, Read the rest of this entry »


New Report on Airport Searches of Muslim, South Asian, & Middle Eastern Communities

April 20, 2009

border-report1By Debbie Sheen

During one of my Constitutional Law class discussions about the Supreme Court’s ruling in the Korematsu case, a fellow student suggested that the United States government should be free to enforce whatever airport search policies that it deemed necessary for national security purposes, especially in light of the September 11 attacks. This comment sparked passionate responses from other classmates who recounted their personal experiences of humiliation and frustration from being targeted at airport searches. The first student’s opinion, Read the rest of this entry »


Sweatshop on Wheels: SF’s Attempt to Pillage the Taxi Industry

April 8, 2009

san-francisco-taxi1By Veena Dubal

“I drove you to Harris’ Steak House once.  Do you know that I have never eaten there? The best I can do is McDonald’s.  And you want to take the happy meals out of the mouths of my children to make yourselves happy!”

–Taxi driver to a SFMTA Board Member during the Taxi Charter Reform Meeting

 

A few months ago, via the SF Chronicle, Mayor Newsom announced a scheme that would fix part of the City’s Budget Crisis.  The City would take medallions (permits that give taxis the right to be on the road) away from working drivers and put them on auction.   This, Newsom, surmised, would generate millions of dollars for the City and improve service.  

Mayor Newsom has since been called on his bluff. Read the rest of this entry »


A Personal Reflection on the Binghamton Incident

April 8, 2009

By Debbie Sheen

Image courtesy of NYtimes.com

Image courtesy of NYtimes.com

It’s been several days since the Binghamton, NY shooting, and I’ve had some time to read through and process the many news stories on Jiverly Wong. But it seems the more information I read, the more questions I have about this tragic incident, and the sadder I become when thinking about the lives of the victims. Read the rest of this entry »


You threaten our communities, & you want our help? No way.

April 6, 2009

iamnotaterrorist

By Veena Dubal

A Coalition of Muslim groups called the American Muslim Taskforce on Civil Rights and Elections (based in Newark) has recently announced that they will limit the social interactions between their communities and the FBI. This decision comes on the heels of the FBI’s decision to “limit” its work with CAIR — the Council on American Islamic Relations. According to the SF Chronicle, the FBI’s decision was based on the fact that one of the founder’s of CAIR was an unindicted co-conspirator in the highly criticized and debated Holy Land Foundation case.

There are many things wrong with this decision by the FBI (namely that the Holy Land Foundation case was a political witchhunt in and of itself and also that being “unindicted” means that one has not been found guilty — what happened to due process?).  Ultimately,  however, the lesson for Muslim and other communities comes as somewhat of a relief for me. Read the rest of this entry »


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.